Support Forums

Support Online : Mon - Fri / 10am - 6pm (GMT +6)

Your Time: Our Time:

Nano Scrollbar

Featured Lock Resolved Bug
Hi all,

the scrollbars in your template are partly default scrollbars or nano scrollbars.
In my attachments you can see the areas i mean.

Is it a bug or possible to setup all scrollbars to nano bars?


Attachments (3)

  • screen-1.jpg
    screen-1.jpg 491.7 KB
  • screen-2.jpg
    screen-2.jpg 518.8 KB
  • screen-3.jpg
    screen-3.jpg 549.4 KB

5 Answers

Paul Frankowski - Staff

More than a month ago #Permalink
it depends on the browser - on some they look nice, and on some browsers do not.
Not all browsers understand modern CSS in this same way.
IE11 fault? if yes, not updated for a long time.

Hubert Müller

More than a month ago #Permalink
I understand but it's only the part on top which used the nanoscrollbar. All other Newsscrollbars are the default scrollbars but in your sourcecode it's a nanobar too. Oh and the hovereffect of the bottom scrollbars is the modern nanobar too?!? You can test it on latest firefox browser. What's the problem or why are the scrollbars different?

Paul Frankowski - Staff

More than a month ago #Permalink
I have Firefox (v65) too and I see a thin scrollbar, but when hovering on it I see more "fat" bar - and it's fully okay.


Attachments (1)

  • hover.png
    hover.png 17.6 KB

Paul Frankowski - Staff

More than a month ago #Permalink
I agree that on the bottom it doesn't look perfect.
But I don't have a solution for that. You have to wait for template update :(

Hubert Müller

More than a month ago #Permalink
I've found a solution for debugging the "fat"-bars!
In your gazette template is a default part with inline style for nano-content. (see in attachments)

style="right: -17px;"

If you change it to style="right: -15px!important;", it looks like the slim bars on top of the template.
My problem is now, how can i change this line or better where is this script to change it.


Attachments (3)

  • fat-bar-1.jpg
    fat-bar-1.jpg 548.4 KB
  • fat-bar-2.jpg
    fat-bar-2.jpg 492 KB
  • slim-bar.jpg
    slim-bar.jpg 495.3 KB

There are no replies made for this post yet.
Be one of the first to reply to this post!

Leaderboard (30 days)

Paul Frankowski

Paul Frankowski

Total Accepted Answers: 135


Total Accepted Answers: 86


Total Accepted Answers: 53


Total Accepted Answers: 6
Rifat Wahid Alif

Rifat Wahid Alif

Total Accepted Answers: 5




Community Users


Don’t miss any updates of our new templates and extensions and all the astonishing offers we bring for you.
We never spam

Joomla! ® name is used under a limited license from Open Source Matters in the United States and other countries. is not affiliated with or endorsed by Open Source Matters or the Joomla! Project.

Connect Us