Recent Templates – Decline In Quality And Depth
Samuel Desloges
Hi JoomShaper team,
As a long-time user and admirer of your work, I’d like to share some feedback about the recent evolution of your templates.
I’ve noticed that you're releasing new templates more frequently, which shows great energy and commitment. However, it seems to come at the expense of overall quality and, more importantly, depth.
When I compare recent templates to older ones like Magnin, Delacroy, or Pitech, the difference is clear. Those older templates came with a rich set of pages — often 10 or more — including multiple homepage variations, About, Services, Pricing, Team, Careers, Portfolio, Blog, FAQ, etc.
By contrast, newer templates such as Renox, Stratos, or Revstat tend to include only 5 or 6 very generic pages, with no real structure variations. They feel more like starting points than fully developed solutions.
And that’s precisely where you used to stand out from your competitors: your templates were not only beautiful but also very complete, saving us a lot of time when building real-world projects.
I fully understand the logic behind a faster release cycle, but I strongly believe it would benefit everyone if you brought back the depth, polish, and ambition that used to define your best templates.
I sincerely hope you’ll take this feedback into account and make adjustments soon — JoomShaper has always stood for excellence, and I believe you can get back to that level quickly.
Thank you for your work and for listening.
Best regards, Sam
Ofi Khan
Accepted AnswerHello Samuel Desloges,
Thank you so much for taking the time to share your feedback with us — and for your longstanding support and thoughtful insights. We truly value voices like yours in the community.
You're absolutely right in pointing out the evolution in our template approach, and your observations are both fair and appreciated. Over the past year, we’ve indeed shifted toward a more frequent release cycle to meet a broader range of needs and use cases. However, we fully acknowledge that in some instances, this has come at the cost of the depth and variety that defined many of our earlier, flagship templates like Magnin, Delacroy, and Pitech.
Templates like DevNox, Stratos, and Revstat were designed to serve as versatile starting points, especially for users seeking lighter, faster-loading solutions — but we understand that many of our users, like yourself, rely on more comprehensive structures to accelerate real-world project development.
Your message is a great reminder of the high standard we've set in the past and the importance of maintaining it going forward. Please know that your comments have been shared directly with our design and development teams.
Thanks again, Sam, not only for your feedback but for the passion and care behind it. We're committed to living up to the expectations that users like you have helped us build.
Best regards
Ofi Khan
Accepted AnswerJust checking in to see if you have feedback on the provided solution. If the answer resolved your query, you can mark it as accepted to close the post and guide others with similar questions. You’ll find a button to accept answers below each comment.
If you need further assistance, feel free to let us know!