Optimizing Images And Image Format - Question | JoomShaper

Optimizing Images And Image Format

Renee

Renee

General 3 years ago

I read a blog article on this site on optimizing images and have been reading on this...

I am debating image formats to use and ways to compress images on my site, I have always understood png's to be best especially for photos as they are lossless

I have generally used png for all photos and graphics and https://tinypng.com/ for compression I also have JCH Pro ([/b]installed and use it to compress images.

  1. I am now reading that Jpg and Jpeg's load faster and still look good and that new formats are even better such as jp2000 and WebP etc should I be starting to use these formats instead ? Will regular programs view convert to this format ?

  2. Thinking about whether my site would benefit using Cloudflare a. with what I already do (above) would this actually reduce image sixes improve load times? The site I am working on is primarily local to my state and the US so a cdn --even free cloudflare worth it

Thanks much I look forward to the "official" and non-official answers from more experienced developers Renee

0
4 Answers
Toufiq
Toufiq
Accepted Answer
Senior Staff 3 years ago #798

Hi there, Thanks for contacting us. We have written a blog post for improving image optimize.

Blog post

-Thanks

0
Renee
Renee
Accepted Answer
3 years ago #1810

Yeah great post thats how I learned to use Tineypng

Does using image compression from a cdn improve on tineypng?

Is it better to use jpeg than png since they are smaller?

I assume the reason we dont use the new formats like Web P and Jpg2000 is the great tools like easyblog and sp pagebuilder aren't ready for them yet? Is that correct? Thanks a million

0
Toufiq
Toufiq
Accepted Answer
Senior Staff 3 years ago #1844

CDN image doesn't compress from the page builder. It depends of your image size.

0
Paul Frankowski
Paul Frankowski
Accepted Answer
Senior Staff 3 years ago #1856

If I may... some graphic formats are not supported by many browsers, so it may not be ideal solution for all webmaster/site owners.

For example: jpg2000: https://caniuse.com/jpeg2000

It's much better with webp (which we fully support in new SPPB): https://caniuse.com/?search=webp

0